Sheldon attempts to restructure and edit the ideas in Mary Baker Eddy’s textbook Science and Health to produce a concise and more coherent form of her radical idealism. His approach is to extract, re-express, and analyze Eddy’s essential core concepts, tapping into a number of explanatory models taken from the history of philosophy, logic, theology, and mathematics.
View AnnotationResources Discussing Plato
The resources that discuss Plato are listed below. Click “View Annotation” to learn more about the resource.
To limit these results by publication date range, resource type, availability and/or whether or not the resource is an official Christian Science publication, click here.
On each individual annotation page you will have the ability to find related annotations based on several different criteria.
8 Results
“Radical Idealism and Empirical Metaphysics in the Work of Mary Baker Eddy” (2022)
Sheldon’s dissertation associates Eddy’s writings and “radical idealism” theology with philosophical writings through the ages. Eddy’s central thesis, Sheldon claims, is that the physical senses are unreliable and create a system of false beliefs about reality. The dissertation also contains a brief history of Eddy’s movement and critical reception as a religion. His assessment includes scholars within and without the Christian Scientist community.
View Annotation“New Thought and the Inner Child in Frances Hodgson Burnett’s Little Lord Fauntleroy” (2018)
Stiles examines late nineteenth-century literary references to the “inner child,” defined as “a person’s original or true self,” in the writings of New Thought authors. She highlights the maternal imagery of Mary Baker Eddy’s church and identifies Frances Hodgson Burnett’s book Little Lord Fauntleroy as a prominent example of literature portraying the child as a model of health and optimism.
View Annotation“Plato, Mary Baker Eddy, and Kenneth Burke: Can We Talk about Substance?” (2018)
Zamparutti claims that Mary Baker Eddy employs Plato’s dialectical method (defining terms by reference to their opposite) to transform the Platonic idea of ‘substance’ into a spiritual principle, God. From Platonist assumptions, Eddy re-conceives substance as the one immaterial Spirit. Burke, as an agnostic, developed his philosophy of language by converting some of Eddy’s ideas learned in childhood, to secular usage.
View Annotation“New Thinking, New Thought, New Age: The Theology and Influence of Emma Curtis Hopkins (1849-1925)” (2002)
Michell examines the influences, and theological connections and differences, between the teachings of Mary Baker Eddy, Emma Curtis Hopkins, the 19th-century Woman’s movement, and the New Thought and New Age movements. Hopkins, unlike Eddy, would see Truth in all religions, not limited to Christianity, and focused more on a prosperity gospel.
View Annotation“Sickness, Death, and Illusion in Christian Science” (2001)
Within the context of the interaction of cultural, intellectual, and religious influences, Prentiss positions Christian Science as a response to orthodox theologies, the lingering effects of the Civil War, horrific medical practices, and the suffrage movement. Christian Science theology appeared to subscribe to Platonic dualism, but its view of matter as a product of a false consciousness distinguishes it from dualism.
View AnnotationMary Baker Eddy: The Years of Discovery (1966)
“Discovery” is the first in a three-volume biography of Mary Baker Eddy by Peel, a literary critic, counter-intelligence officer, and editorial consultant to the Christian Science Church. Striving for a straightforward account, without apologetics or polemics, Peel examines Eddy’s intellectual and spiritual path of discovery, from her life of obscurity and loss to her search for health and spiritual breakthrough.
View AnnotationChristian Science and the Catholic Faith: Including a Brief Account of New Thought and Other Modern Mental Healing Movements (1922)
If Bellwald had had access to archival resources on Christian Science, he might have made a more accurate comparison between Christian Science and Roman Catholicism of the early twentieth century. His organizational approach to his study is well conceived, but he combines the resources of blatant polemics, Milmine and Peabody, with his own Catholic perspectives to denounce Christian Science.
View Annotation